Categorical Imperative vs. Utilitarianism

Kant: the oecumenical Law organic natural law of the compressed overbearing Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law defining of the Categorical Imperative as a rule for determining pietism of movements. This formula is a two diverge test. First, one creates a dictum and considers whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rational beings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would forget it to be a universal law. Once it is pass water that the maxim passes some(prenominal) prongs of the test, there are no exceptions. As a paramedical set about with a distraught widow who asks whether her previous(a) husband suffered in his accidental death, you moldiness decide which maxim to create and based on the test which action to perform. The maxim when answering a widows motion as to the nature and term of her late husbands death, one should always spot the truth regarding the nature of her late husbands death (M1) passes both move of the Unive rsal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative. Consequently, harmonise to Kant, M1 is a moral action. The initial stage of the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative requires that a maxim be universally applicable to all rational beings. M1 succeeds in passing the origin stage. We target easily imagine a world in which paramedics always answer widows truth amplyy when queried. Therefore, this maxim is logical and all(prenominal)one heap abide by it without causing a logical impossibility. The sound logical step is to apply the present moment stage of the test. The second urgency is that a rational being would will this maxim to become a universal law. In testing this part, you must(prenominal) decide whether in every case, a rational being would believe that the morally correct action is to tell the truth. First, it is clear that the widow expects to... If you want to get a full essay, assure it on our website: OrderCust! omPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper