Case Study: Coke India

divert read it c arefully and weigh the important of the information as you estimate to advise Coke Indians President, Sansei rainbow fish. Organizing your paper use these steps to complete your paper. The requirements accept a number of worksheets designed to help you write a peachy case. The worksheets should be attached to the end of the case. Worksheets The case ends on page 13 (before the extra and supporting material) with a series of decisions that Coke India President Sansei Guppy needs to make.First, putting yourself in President Septas shoes, identify the key decisions that he needs to make and make a list. What basic choices are executable? affix it to your completed paper. Next, create a stakeholders compendium Identifying the parties who have an elicit In this case. Evaluate whether you need to add or subtract from this list. Attach it to your completed paper. (See How to Construct a Stakeholder Analysis) Case Analysis witness your decision list and analyze yo ur decision options from an honorable standpoint.Keep the stakeholders In mind. devote each of the three perspectives for making an ethical decision featured In the Decked chapter and the class readings utilitarianism, cabbage minimization, and universalism. You are free to apply additional decision-making models from the Decked chapter. shew what each of the three perspectives you would choose as the ethical line of work of follow out and why. Utilitarian Analysis Following the Instructions provided in the handout How to rebuild a utilitarian stakeholder analysis. Please make sure you use the lists of stakeholders and decisions to keep an eye on your work to make sure you are thorough. Attach the utilitarian analysis to your completed paper. Support your reasoning by using any of the tolerate readings, from honesty and integrity to corporate social responsibility ideas from Friedman, Stout and Ma (as irruption to be useful. When in doubt, Just look at the course calendar De cisions and Conclusions Clearly indicate final decision(s) that you would make, and the degree to which each decision is self-consistent with each ethical perspective.Be as detailed in possible in describing the decision(s) you would make and/or the action(s) you would take. If one or more of the perspectives disagrees with your decision, indicate why you do non choose to follow the guidance of that perspective(s). State what is scathe with the perspective for you, either in the context of the decision, ND/or exclusively for you as the decision maker. Again, back up your reasoning dont Just convey your opinion or hope I will guess what you are referring to try using the PAP citation method, such as (Friedman, p. 9) continuance Approximately 4-6 double-spaced pages, 12-point font and I-inch margins. It will be difficult to birth an analysis of sufficient sagacity in less than 4 pages. The transfer link allows for you to upload your essay as an attachment. Please do not cut and paste it into the Submission part of the form. Your grade will be based on the Analysis Paper Rubric provided with the break away Expectations and the Course Calendar. In short Analytical rigor depth and complexity in analysis using class readings. To get good grade on this paper (I. . , A or B), you need to apply the ethical perspectives (I. E. , utilitarianism, profit minimization, universalism) in depth. This will require a thorough understanding of the ethical perspectives. If after reviewing the assigned readings (especially the Decked chapter) you do not feel you possess this depth of understanding, you should contact me so that we can go over the ethical perspectives to put up your understanding. Proofreading and Writing spelling, grammar, sentence construction as well as clarity, and cohesion.